<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>marius dot org &#187; photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marius.org/category/photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marius.org</link>
	<description>My random ramblings and musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:01:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>D70 vs. Digital Rebel</title>
		<link>http://www.marius.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marius.org%2F2004%2F04%2F04%2Fd70_vs_digital_%2F&#038;seed_title=D70+vs.+Digital+Rebel</link>
		<comments>http://www.marius.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marius.org%2F2004%2F04%2F04%2Fd70_vs_digital_%2F&#038;seed_title=D70+vs.+Digital+Rebel#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2004 02:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d70]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital rebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marius.org/wordpress/2004/04/04/d70_vs_digital_rebel.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Camera Comparison: Canon Digital Rebel (EOS-300D) vs. Nikon D70 Background After having had the Canon Digital Rebel since September 13, 2003, I picked up the Nikon D70 digital camera on April 3, 2004. Since I have both of these cameras &#8230; <a href="http://www.marius.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marius.org%2F2004%2F04%2F04%2Fd70_vs_digital_%2F&#038;seed_title=D70+vs.+Digital+Rebel">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Camera Comparison: Canon Digital Rebel (EOS-300D) vs. Nikon <span class="caps">D70</span></h3>
<h4>Background</h4>
<p>After having had the Canon Digital Rebel since September 13, 2003, I picked up the Nikon <span class="caps">D70 </span>digital camera on April 3, 2004. Since I have both of these cameras in hand for at least the short-term future, I&#39;ve decided to write up a real-world comparison of the two cameras. </p>
<p>To start off, let me give you a little background about myself. I&#39;m an avid amateur photographer. I&#39;ve been dealing with 35mm <span class="caps">SLR </span>since the Canon <span class="caps">A2E, </span>and moved over to digital photography with the release of the Fuji FinePix <span class="caps">S602Z </span>(of which I maintain an <acronym title="Frequently Asked Questions">FAQ</acronym> list <a href="http://www.marius.org/fuji602faq.php">here</a>). In September 2003, Canon released the Digital Rebel (EOS-300D in Europe, <span class="caps">KISS</span> Digital in most of Asia) and I switched over to <acronym title="digital Single Lens Reflex">DSLR</acronym> photography and haven&#39;t looked back since. I&#39;ve taken approximately 2700 shots since September with the Digital Rebel, and I also host a <acronym title="Frequently Asked Questions">FAQ</acronym> list for it as well <a href="http://www.marius.org/eos300dfaq.php">here</a>. With the recent release of Nikon&#39;s <span class="caps">D70 </span><acronym title="digital Single Lens Reflex">DSLR</acronym>, I&#39;ve decided to check out Nikon&#39;s side of the digital photography world.</p>
<h4>The Contenders</h4>
<p>Nikon <span class="caps">D70,</span> S/N 3008003<br />
Nikon AF-S 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED DX S/N <span class="caps">US2003209</span></p>
<p>Canon Digital Rebel, S/N 0460007128<br />
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 S/N 80002116<br />
(Possibly the first received in the US &#8212; Receipt dated September 13, 2003 at 10:04am Central time; the date of the camera&#39;s release!)</p>
<h4>More Background</h4>
<p>All that being said, both cameras are excellent cameras. There has been much talk on several photography forums about Canon&#39;s supposed &#8220;crippling&#8221; of the Digital Rebel so as to not compete with it&#39;s big brother, the <span class="caps">EOS</span>-10D. I don&#39;t know that I adhere to the viewpoint that the Digital Rebel is &#8220;crippled&#8221; &#8212; but it is lacking in a few features that presumably could have been left in the design with a few simple software modifications. However, I agree with a lot of other people (and probably Canon&#39;s marketing here) &#8212; if you want these features, step up and buy the <span class="caps">EOS</span>-10D; there&#39;s a reason the <acronym title="Digital Rebel">DR</acronym> is US$500 less than the <span class="caps">EOS</span>-10D.</p>
<h4>Testing Methods &amp; Theory</h4>
<p>My test methodologies are as follows: since it was my first day out with the <span class="caps">D70,</span> I invited a friend over to use the Digital Rebel and we&#39;d go take (approximately) the same pictures at the same place. I don&#39;t care for precise measurements of the camera since other professional review sites deal with that just fine, and we&#39;ll get those results when they come out. My review focus is on the practical usability of the cameras and their picture qualities. Cameras were used on automatic white balance in programmed exposure (P) mode. <span class="caps">ISO </span>was left at 200 at all times on the <span class="caps">D70, </span>while the DR photographer varied between <span class="caps">ISO100 </span>and <span class="caps">ISO400.</span> Both cameras were using Kingston compact flash memory (1GB in the <span class="caps">D70,</span> 256MB in the Digital Rebel), and both cameras were using their automatic focus modes.</p>
<h4>The Learning Curve</h4>
<p>Nikon and Canon&#39;s ergonomics and methodologies are drastically different. If you&#39;re a Canon guy coming over to the Nikon system, expect to spend a few days figuring out what the heck is going on with the Nikon system; especially the lenses. (D types, G types, AI-S, etc.) It&#39;s a bit more complicated than Canon&#39;s system, but within the complication lies the beauty that a modern D-type <span class="caps">CPU </span>lens can be used with a Nikon f-mount camera from the 1950&#39;s. Canon&#39;s current line of <span class="caps">EOS </span>mount lenses can only be used with <span class="caps">EOS </span>mount cameras going back to the early 1980&#39;s. This likely won&#39;t have an impact on your day to day digital photography, but it gives insight into Nikon&#39;s engineering and desire to support more than just the last 20 years of equipment.</p>
<h4>Lenses &amp; Settings</h4>
<p>Since I have only one Nikon lens currently, I decided that to keep the testing between cameras fair we would be limited to using only the &#8220;kit&#8221; or &#8220;outfit&#8221; lenses that came with the camera. The Digital Rebel would use the Canon EF-s 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 lens, while the <span class="caps">D70 </span>would use Nikon&#39;s AF-S 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED DX lens. After taking in the field of view crop multipliers, the Canon is equivalent to a 35mm 29-88mm lens, while the <span class="caps">D70 </span>is equivalent to a 27-105mm lens (Canon <span class="caps">FOV</span> Crop is 1.6, Nikon is 1.5). Personally, I find that I shoot wide-angle more frequently than telephoto, so the Nikon 1.5 crop is advantageous to me.</p>
<p>Individual camera picture settings were as follows:</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Setting</td>
<td>Canon Digital Rebel</td>
<td>Nikon <span class="caps">D70</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Image Quality</td>
<td>Fine</td>
<td>Fine</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Image Size</td>
<td>Large</td>
<td>Large</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sharpening</td>
<td>+1</td>
<td>Normal</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tone Compensation</td>
<td>Normal</td>
<td>Normal</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Color Mode</td>
<td>sRGB</td>
<td>Adobe <span class="caps">RGB</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Saturation</td>
<td>Normal</td>
<td>Normal</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Contrast</td>
<td>Normal</td>
<td>N/A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hue Adjustment</td>
<td>N/A</td>
<td>0{deg}</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Exposure Comp</td>
<td>0EV</td>
<td>-1/3EV</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h4>Results</h4>
<p>Out of the box and unprocessed pictures are available for review <a href="http://www.marius.org/gallery/v/photography/rebel-vs-d70/">here</a>. Please note that the <span class="caps">D70 </span>pictures were taken in Adobe <span class="caps">RGB </span>mode and you will need a viewer that is capable of discerning color space information to view them correctly. Internet Explorer, nor Mozilla Firefox are capable of doing this correctly. I don&#39;t know of any web browsers that are; if you do, drop me an <a href="mailto:%6D%61%72%69%75%73%40%6D%61%72%69%75%73%2E%6F%72%67">e-mail</a>. <b><span class="caps">UPDATE</span> 2/10/2005</b>: I&#39;ve gotten several e-mails from people that indicated that Opera supports color management. Awesome! Thanks to all who followed up with me on that.</p>
<p>As far as I&#39;m concerned, the <span class="caps">D70 </span>and the Digital Rebel are both wonderful cameras. The DR has the edge on the <span class="caps">D70 </span>in its <span class="caps">ISO </span>range (100-1600 on the <span class="caps">DR,</span> 200-1600 on the <span class="caps">D70</span>) but the <span class="caps">D70 </span>fights back with 1/3EV increments on <span class="caps">ISO </span>instead of 1EV increments (i.e., DR does 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600; <span class="caps">D70 </span>does 200, 250, 320, 400, etc.). </p>
<p>The <span class="caps">D70 </span>seems to have more accurate reproduction of colors, at least in Adobe <span class="caps">RGB </span>mode. They are vibrant, and the D2h color balance sensor does an awesome job of getting white balance spot-on in automatic mode. Furthermore, the <span class="caps">D70 </span>allows you to fine-tune all the white balance presets, and even the automatic <acronym title="White Balance">WB</acronym> mode to allow for slightly warmer or cooler images. In a dash of genius, Nikon engineers set the fine tuning for flourescent lighting to have a much more pronounced effect; this accounts for the major differences in flourescent lighting. (I miss the old days of my Fuji FinePix <span class="caps">S602Z </span>&#8211; it had presets for cool flourescent, warm flourescent, and normal flourescent) Unfortunately, custom white balance can not be fine tuned for warmer/cooler settings.</p>
<p>The <span class="caps">D70 </span>is a much faster responding camera; flip the power switch and it&#39;s ready to shoot while the DR takes about 3 seconds to be ready for action. The ergonomics on the <span class="caps">D70 </span>seem a bit more sensical to me, but that&#39;s a very subjective statement that is best judged by you going to a camera shop and handling them both yourself.</p>
<p>The Canon rear lens caps and body cap have always meshed together well for storage while the lens is on the camera; unfortunately the Nikon caps don&#39;t snap together very well and rattle quite loudly when you have them in this setup. Wildlife photographers and professional stalkers (hah) need to beware of this potential noise issue. I love the fact that the <span class="caps">D70 </span>has a protective screen over the back <span class="caps">LCD </span>panel to keep my noseprints off the screen.</p>
<p>The ability to force set AF-S mode on the <span class="caps">D70 </span>(equivalent to AI Servo mode in Canon lingo) came in handy while photographing flying ducks at the park today. The DR photographer wasn&#39;t able to catch the flying ducks at 30 feet while the <span class="caps">D70 </span>had no problem with it. The <span class="caps">EOS</span>-10D can do this, but doesn&#39;t have the built-in spot meter. The main difference between the 10D and the <span class="caps">D70 </span>is the spot meter and the mirror lock up. Whichever of those you need, pick the camera accordingly.</p>
<h4>The Moire Issue</h4>
<p>A lot has been made on photography forums regarding moire from the <span class="caps">D70 </span>due to it&#39;s weaker <acronym title="Anti-Aliasing">AA</acronym> filter. In my shooting today, I found two cases of minor moire out of approximately 80 images shot. They were both on the same subject &#8212; a male mallard duck. Male mallards have very tight black and white striped feathers on their back. The DR didn&#39;t exhibit moire on these, but it was unable to resolve the stripes accurately. The weaker <acronym title="Anti-Aliasing">AA</acronym> filter on the <span class="caps">D70 </span>allowed the sensor to see the stripes, albeit with moire there as well. Post-processing could have eliminated it easily, in my opinion.</p>
<h4>The Lenses</h4>
<p>The Nikon AF-S 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED DX lens is bar-none far superior to the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 lens. The build construction is far superior, the metal connection point as opposed to the plastic on the Canon, and the use of non-glass elements lead to a superior piece of craftsmanship. One thing I did notice between the two lenses (I presume lenses; it could&#39;ve been something to do with the pentamirrors) is a slight color shift (each of them are slight; compared to one another, the shifts are quite dramatic). Looking through the viewfinders, I find the Canon to be slightly cold looking, while the Nikon viewfinder exhibits a green tint. The green tint is quite a bit more subtle than the stark coldness provided by the Canon to my eye, but decent white balancing should take care of that. The Nikon lens has a superior petal-style hood, and a true focusing ring (unlike the Canon&#39;s &#8220;spin the tip of the lens&#8221; style focus ring). Zoom and focus on the Nikon are smooth, but not nearly as smooth as my Canon EF 70-200 f/4L. Since the Nikon is <acronym title="Inner Focusing">IF</acronym>, the front element doesn&#39;t move during focusing, simplifying the use of a polarizing filter. The Canon kit lens is front focusing, which makes polarizer use in non-still life and non-landscape situations difficult at best.</p>
<h4>Playback Issues</h4>
<p>Here&#39;s one where Canon takes the cake. The magnification ability during playback whoops the Nikon&#39;s playback zoom. I seem to recall seeing somewhere that the Canon can do 9X magnification during playback; I would guess that the Nikon is around 6X magnification. Coupled with the awkward button mashing combination to magnify playback on the Nikon makes it quite difficult.</p>
<h4>Conclusion</h4>
<p>That all said, I think I&#39;ll be keeping the <span class="caps">D70 </span>and exiting the Canon arena. The <span class="caps">D70</span>&#39;s  increased manual control options fit where I want to be in photography &#8212; in control of the tool that I&#39;m using to take pictures. The DR served me well, and is an excellent camera for those that don&#39;t need to be in control of metering modes and focus modes. As a bonus, the <span class="caps">D70 </span>gets me a true 1{deg} spot meter.</p>
<p>I&#39;ll update this review as I have more opportunities to compare the cameras in different situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marius.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marius.org%2F2004%2F04%2F04%2Fd70_vs_digital_%2F&#038;seed_title=D70+vs.+Digital+Rebel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Basics</title>
		<link>http://www.marius.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marius.org%2F2003%2F10%2F15%2Fthe_basics%2F&#038;seed_title=The+Basics</link>
		<comments>http://www.marius.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marius.org%2F2003%2F10%2F15%2Fthe_basics%2F&#038;seed_title=The+Basics#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 01:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marius.org/wordpress/2003/10/15/the_basics.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#39;ve always enjoyed photography, and migrated to digital photography in June 2002 with a Fuji Finepix S602Z digital camera. The camera served me well, but with the recent (September 2003) introduction of the Canon Digital Rebel, I&#39;ve upgraded and gone &#8230; <a href="http://www.marius.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marius.org%2F2003%2F10%2F15%2Fthe_basics%2F&#038;seed_title=The+Basics">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve always enjoyed photography, and migrated to digital photography in June 2002 with a Fuji Finepix <span class="caps">S602Z </span>digital camera. The camera served me well, but with the recent (September 2003) introduction of the <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/">Canon</a> Digital Rebel, I&#39;ve upgraded and gone <span class="caps">SLR.</span> The Fuji has gone to a better home courtesy of <a href="http://www.ebay.com/">eBay</a> &#8212; it&#39;s in Hawaii now (hey&#8230; I&#39;m jealous). Additionally, Diann has a <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/">Canon</a> Powershot <span class="caps">A60 </span>that I bought for her while she was in San Diego. To compliment the <span class="caps">A60,</span> I bought Canon&#39;s WP-DC-700 Underwater housing that we recently took with us to <a href="http://www.marius.org/gallery/belize2003/">Belize</a> for <acronym title="Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus">SCUBA</acronym> shots.</p>
<p>I maintain and host <acronym title="Frequently Asked Question">FAQ</acronym>&#39;s for the Fuji <span class="caps">S602Z </span>and the <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/">Canon</a> Digital Rebel:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.marius.org/fuji602faq.php">Fuji <span class="caps">S602Z FAQ</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.marius.org/eos300dfaq.php">Canon Digital Rebel/EOS-300D/KISS <span class="caps">FAQ</span></a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marius.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marius.org%2F2003%2F10%2F15%2Fthe_basics%2F&#038;seed_title=The+Basics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

