Those of you unfamiliar with RFC1918 can move along to the next entry. The rest of you, figure out WTF?1
[504][20:58][pa][marius:sashimi.marius.org~]% dig shsu.edu
; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> shsu.edu
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 21826
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 3
;; QUERY SECTION:
;; shsu.edu, type = A, class = IN
;; ANSWER SECTION:
shsu.edu. 10M IN A 158.135.1.10
shsu.edu. 10M IN A 158.135.1.11
shsu.edu. 10M IN A 192.168.234.235
Does anyone else see anything inherently WRONG about using an RFC1918 network address for your domain's DNS A record?
1 This was pointed out to me by Bill, actually.